 login/create account
login/create account
    Direct proof of a theorem about compact funcoids
Conjecture   Let  is a
 is a  -separable (the same as
-separable (the same as  for symmetric transitive) compact funcoid and
 for symmetric transitive) compact funcoid and  is a uniform space (reflexive, symmetric, and transitive endoreloid) such that
 is a uniform space (reflexive, symmetric, and transitive endoreloid) such that  . Then
. Then  .
. 
 is a
 is a  -separable (the same as
-separable (the same as  for symmetric transitive) compact funcoid and
 for symmetric transitive) compact funcoid and  is a uniform space (reflexive, symmetric, and transitive endoreloid) such that
 is a uniform space (reflexive, symmetric, and transitive endoreloid) such that  . Then
. Then  .
. The main purpose here is to find a direct proof of this conjecture. It seems that this conjecture can be derived from the well known theorem about existence of exactly one uniformity on a compact set. But that would be what I call an indirect proof, we need a direct proof instead.
The direct proof may be constructed by correcting all errors an omissions in this draft article.
Direct proof could be better because with it we would get a little more general statement like this:
Conjecture   Let  be a
 be a  -separable compact reflexive symmetric funcoid and
-separable compact reflexive symmetric funcoid and  be a reloid such that
 be a reloid such that
 be a
 be a  -separable compact reflexive symmetric funcoid and
-separable compact reflexive symmetric funcoid and  be a reloid such that
 be a reloid such that-    \item 
 ;      \item
;      \item  .
.  Then  .
. 
Bibliography
Victor Porton. Compact funcoids
* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.
 
           Drupal
 Drupal CSI of Charles University
 CSI of Charles University