login/create account
Reed's omega, delta, and chi conjecture
For a graph
, we define
to be the maximum degree,
to be the size of the largest clique subgraph, and
to be the chromatic number of
.
for every graph
. Perhaps the two most trivial bounds on
are
and
. The above conjecture roughly asserts that the (rounded-up) average of
and
should again be an upper bound on
.
The conjecture is easy to verify when
is very large. It is trivial when
, and it follows from Brook's theorem if
. On the other hand, if
, so
is triangle free, then the conjecture is also true for
sufficiently large. Indeed, Johannsen proved the much stronger fact that there exists a fixed constant
so that
for every triangle free graph
.
Reed showed that the conjecture holds when
by way of matching theory. More interestingly, he proved (using probabilistc methods) that the conjecture is true provided that
is sufficiently large, and
is sufficiently close to
. More precisely, he proves the following:
such that for every
, if
is a graph of maximum degree
with no clique of size
for some
then
. It is known that the conjecture is true fractionally (that is with
replaced by
, the fractional chromatic number of~
).
Bibliography
*[R] B. Reed,
, and
, J. Graph Theory 27 (1998) 177-212.
* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.
changed
Thanks for the comment. I changed the statement to the conjectured (slightly stronger) version with round-up.
Drupal
CSI of Charles University
The statement of the
The statement of the conjecture is slightly incorrect. Instead of the +1 at the end, there should simply be a round-up. The conjecture is true for line graphs and quasi-line graphs, graphs with independence number 2, and any graph on I believe 12 vertices.
An outright proof of the result for triangle-free graphs would be very nice. Lovasz' result on splitting graphs is not quite enough in this case.